Proposed Addition of Protection Waiver

[Chris_Savard]

From the Crusaders....


Hi Chris,

I’m away and can’t login to the forum...

I like the way it is now. I vote against the proposed change.

Can you post for me?

Please & Thanks,
D’Arcy

Sent from my iPhone

[Angus_MacDonald]

Wave votes no on the proposal, with complexity and overhead being the reason why.

[Chris_Savard]

I am close to sending out a cleanup draft of the constitution. One of the things it will contain is the elimination for the formal summer meeting and proposals posted here (during the month of August) for rule changes.

If I were chairing this meeting with the owners present, I would not allow multiple motions to be voted on at the same time. In this particular thread, there is a motion made by the MARKSMEN and seconded by the COW PUCKS.

Two other proposals have been suggested but they are contrary to the main motion and have not been seconded. As such, there is only one motion being considered at this time. I would ask that you limit your comment and vote to the MARK/COW motion. Other motions can be made in a separate thread.

The current vote is

FOR
1) MARK
2) COW

AGAINST
1) OUT
2) BULL
3) SPART
4) CRUSH
5) XMEN
6) HIGH
7) CRUS
8) WAVE

[Jean_Davignon]

I am for the waiver changes proposed by Marksman and second by Cow Puck.

Jean Polar Bear

[Pat Shane]

Despite some valid points raised, Irish are good with the current format...as such my vote at this time is no..

[John Baird]

Oil Kings are against the proposal.

[Kelly Boisvenue]

I'm not in favour

[Dean Eastman]

Ice Miners are against the proposal.

[Tim_Cornett]

Rebels haven't had enough experience with the minor system so I will abstain.

[Jacob Dionne]

I am against the proposal.